A full polishing range.
From cutting and one-step correction to final finishing.
Match coatings to PPF, vinyl, matte finishes, wheels, glass, trim and upholstery.

A fabric treatment should be evaluated for the qualities users notice, including feel and flexibility where relevant.

A removable cover may be maintained differently from fixed upholstery. The treatment must fit the textile's approved washing and care process.

A patterned textile can contain dyes or finishes that respond differently. A trial should represent the actual material rather than one convenient pale section.

Upholstery includes thread and seam details as well as the main face material. Those components should appear in a representative compatibility trial.

Leather surfaces can have different finishing systems. The exposed finish, not the generic word leather, determines the compatibility question.

A repaired leather area may carry a different finish from the original upholstery. Its readiness and compatibility need specific confirmation.

Appearance alone does not address every practical use concern. Where transfer is relevant, the evaluation should follow a suitable approved method.

Interior plastics include decorative trim, controls and optical components with different requirements. A single generic plastics approval is insufficient.

Cosmetic upholstery treatment should not extend to safety components without the vehicle manufacturer's explicit approval.

A coating that changes feel or slickness may be unsuitable for a control surface. Cosmetic appearance is not the only acceptance requirement.

A cleaned textile may retain moisture beneath its visible surface. Readiness must follow the textile and treatment instructions.

A worn finish and surface dirt need different responses. Repeated cleaning cannot necessarily restore material that has been lost.