A full polishing range.
From cutting and one-step correction to final finishing.
A cycle in a linear abrasion test is not automatically equivalent to a cycle in a rotary test. Report the actual apparatus and procedure rather than converting cycle counts through an assumed universal factor.
Updated · NANOLAB Knowledge
Taber notes that differences in wear paths, settings and material behaviour prevent a standard conversion between its linear and rotary arrangements. For buyers, the useful comparison begins with the service question and the test configuration. A larger cycle count from a different method is not a standalone ranking of coating durability.
Illustrative example: one supplier reports 1,000 linear cycles and another reports 500 rotary cycles. Calling the first coating twice as durable would ignore the different tests. The reports need a technical review before they can support any relative performance statement.
Do not translate laboratory cycles directly into car washes or years of use without supporting evidence. This guide does not prescribe an abrasion method for a NANOLAB coating. Select and interpret testing with the responsible laboratory and keep claims within the demonstrated scope.
Technical references: Taber: linear abrasion testing. These sources describe their stated methods or products; they do not certify NANOLAB products or establish compatibility with an unlisted surface.
Ask NANOLAB about the exact product and intended use. Use the current product documentation for formulation-specific instructions.