A full polishing range.
From cutting and one-step correction to final finishing.
A scratch that catches a fingernail deserves caution, but a touch test is not a measurement of remaining clear coat. Do not turn it into a universal heavy-cut recommendation.
Updated · NANOLAB Knowledge
Record the visible defect and its location first. A tactile observation can add context, but it does not identify the exact paint layer, repair history or available correction margin. Avoid repeated contact on a dirty surface simply to classify the scratch.
Check edges, body lines, repaired areas and nearby chips. Review thickness information only within the capability of the instrument and substrate. A reading on adjacent flat paint does not automatically describe the material beneath the scratch.
Some jobs justify modest reduction in visibility while preserving the finish. Others need a refinishing discussion rather than more compound. Explain the proposed outcome with a prepared test area, not a rule such as every catchable scratch needs sanding.
Compare the dry surface with the original reference and stop if the agreed boundary is reached. Keep the remaining scratch in the handover record. A clear explanation of a retained defect is more useful than promising complete removal without reliable evidence.
No. The touch result alone cannot establish the finish, defect depth or suitable process. Use inspection and a controlled trial to define the realistic outcome.