A full polishing range.
From cutting and one-step correction to final finishing.
Compare paired coating measurements through their differences across the working range, rather than treating high correlation as interchangeability.
Updated · NANOLAB Knowledge

Two instruments can track high and low samples closely while disagreeing by an amount that matters to acceptance. Correlation describes association; paired differences address agreement more directly.
Choose specimens spanning the intended working range. Use comparable locations and conditions, and record the measurement order. If the surface changes between readings, instrument difference and specimen change become difficult to separate.
For each specimen, subtract instrument B from instrument A using the same sign convention throughout. Plot the difference against the pair’s mean. Look for a constant offset, increasing spread or a difference that changes with measurement level.
The engineering tolerance should come from the intended decision. A small average difference can coexist with large positive and negative differences. Under suitable assumptions, a Bland–Altman analysis summarises bias and limits of agreement; repeated measurements or non-constant spread require an appropriate analysis.
Do not infer which instrument is accurate merely from their disagreement; that requires an appropriate reference and uncertainty assessment. Keep the conclusion limited to the tested range, materials and measurement procedures.
The sources below support the stated concepts or describe their own methods. The worked scenarios are editorial examples, not NANOLAB test results.
Ask NANOLAB about your surface and intended use. For application and care, use the current instructions for the exact product.

Using a Run Chart to Spot a Step Change after an Applicator Replacement