MATRIX ELITE P7020
The next flagship of the MATRIX series.
Select and document test panels that support repeatable coating trials without confusing differences in paint, preparation or panel history.
Updated · NANOLAB Knowledge

A test-panel library can make coating evaluations easier to repeat. The important feature is not the number of panels but the quality of their records. Unknown paint history, old protection or inconsistent polishing can make two apparently similar panels behave differently.
Separate practice panels, appearance-comparison panels and panels reserved for a particular compatibility trial. A heavily used training panel may be useful for learning hand movements but unsuitable for comparing subtle finish differences. Record the known substrate and paint history, and mark uncertainty clearly.
Use the paint inspection guide to establish a baseline. Avoid treating a panel with repeated polishing or unknown repair history as equivalent to a fresh reference surface.
Use a reference that remains readable without marking the test area. Record preparation, products applied, dates, removal attempts and any changes in appearance. Photograph the clean baseline under a repeatable light position.
If a panel is divided into sections, keep the section map with the record. Leave enough separation to avoid carrying product or towel residue from one test area to another.
Before a new trial, decide whether the panel can be returned to a suitable baseline. Do not assume a quick wipe removes a cured coating. If the previous treatment cannot be confidently accounted for, assign the panel to a different purpose or retire it from comparative testing.
The old-coating removal guide explains why surface history matters. Repeated abrasion can also change the paint available for future work, so endless reuse is not automatically a good economy.
Include panel identity, section, product reference, application conditions, preparation, installer, timing and inspection result. A second person should be able to understand the trial without relying on the first person’s memory.
Use the library with a coating test spot and, where appropriate, a blind sample comparison. It is a practical training and evaluation tool. It does not replace testing on the actual approved substrate or establish compatibility beyond the product’s documented scope.

Collecting Installer Feedback That Improves a Coating Product