A full polishing range.
From cutting and one-step correction to final finishing.
Track waiting between polishing and final inspection so workshop capacity improvements target delays as well as machine time.
Updated · NANOLAB Knowledge

A vehicle can finish machine polishing and still wait a long time for cleanup, inspection or release. If only polishing time is measured, the workshop may optimise the wrong part of the job.
Use clear events such as polishing complete, ready for inspection, inspection started and accepted release. Record why a job is not ready rather than allowing every delay to appear as inspector waiting time.
| Interval | Possible cause |
|---|---|
| Polishing to inspection-ready | Cleanup, residue removal or missing work |
| Ready to inspection | Inspector availability or scheduling |
| Inspection to release | Rework, documentation or customer timing |
If a vehicle spends 25 minutes in final cleanup and 70 minutes waiting for an inspector, reducing the compound’s cutting time by five minutes will not resolve the main delay. The appropriate action may involve inspection scheduling or clearer readiness signals.
Some product-specific processing intervals are necessary. Record them separately from queues caused by missing equipment or staff. Do not shorten required conditions to make the workflow chart look faster.
For example, schedule a defined inspection slot or add a visible ready-for-inspection state. Compare accepted turnaround and rework before extending the change.
The useful measure is how reliably a job reaches accepted completion. A workshop can improve delivery capacity without making operators polish faster when the largest losses occur after the machine has already stopped.
Ask NANOLAB about your surface and intended use. For application and care, use the current instructions for the exact product.

Capturing Unplanned Refining Time in a Paint-Correction Job Record