A full polishing range.
From cutting and one-step correction to final finishing.
Handle an unidentified coating sample by recording receipt, requesting traceable product information and separating identity resolution from performance testing.
Updated · NANOLAB Knowledge

A coating sample arrives with a product name but no readable batch identifier. Starting a polished comparison immediately can produce results that cannot later be linked to the supplied material. Resolve identity before spending customer panels, labour or credibility on a test you cannot trace.
Photograph the pack, label, closure and relevant shipping reference. Give it an internal receipt identifier that preserves the original condition. Do not create a supplier batch number or infer one from another bottle. An internal receipt number helps control the sample; it is not a substitute for the missing production identity.
| Information | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Exact product or sample code | Identify what is being evaluated |
| Batch or traceable production reference | Connect results to the supplied material |
| Applicable instructions | Define preparation, application and cure conditions |
| Safety information | Establish handling and storage requirements |
| Sample status | Distinguish a development candidate from an approved commercial product |
Ask the supplier to connect its response explicitly to the received sample. A generic brochure about a similarly named product does not resolve the identity question.
Store the sample appropriately using the available handling information and your receiving procedures. If the necessary safe handling information is missing, obtain it before use. Do not run exploratory application on a customer vehicle simply because the sample quantity is small.
Keep the sample segregated from released working stock. That prevents another operator from taking an unidentified bottle into a routine job while the enquiry is still open.
After identity is resolved, connect the supplier confirmation to the receipt record and start the approved trial. If identity remains incomplete, a limited exploratory exercise may sometimes have internal value, but the report must retain that limitation and should not be used as batch-release evidence or a general product claim.
For an illustrative example, a distributor may receive two development samples labelled only A and B. Those codes can be sufficient if the supplier maintains a traceable mapping and confirms the instructions and status for each. The problem is not a particular label format; it is the absence of a reliable connection between sample and record.
Record any transfer to smaller containers, the test surfaces and the remaining sample. Keep original packaging where suitable. If the supplier later sends a replacement, give it a new receipt record instead of quietly substituting it into the first sample’s results.
A clear receipt and identity process saves work. It ensures a promising outcome can be repeated with the right material and a disappointing outcome can be investigated without guessing which sample was actually tested.
Discuss a private-label coating project. Follow the current instructions for the exact product when planning application and care.

A Coating Demo for a Distributor: Build a Repeatable Live Session