A full polishing range.
From cutting and one-step correction to final finishing.
Control inspection-wipe technique when comparing polished surfaces so the assessment step does not introduce different marks or residue removal.
Updated · NANOLAB Knowledge

The inspection wipe is part of a polishing comparison. If one operator wipes lightly and another scrubs a small area repeatedly, the surfaces may enter inspection with different residue and mechanical histories.
Use a cleaner and towel system compatible with the paint and polishing process. Specify the practical sequence, towel condition and replacement cue. Avoid an arbitrary force target unless it belongs to a validated measurement method.
Have operators demonstrate the procedure on suitable test surfaces and compare the dry result under the same light. Record whether the wipe removes the required residue without adding visible marks.
| Variable | Control question |
|---|---|
| Towel | Same type and verified clean condition? |
| Liquid | Supported product and application method? |
| Repeated passes | Defined routine or uncontrolled extra work? |
If haze appears only after one inspection method, compare matched areas using the approved alternatives. Preserve the original surface record and avoid repeatedly wiping the same spot until its history becomes untraceable.
An inspection wipe should not quietly become another polishing or aggressive cleaning stage. If further correction is required, record it as such and reassess through the complete process.
Consistent wiping improves confidence in the comparison because the final inspection is less likely to create the difference being attributed to the compound. It also gives new operators a concrete procedure instead of a vague instruction to wipe until it looks right.
Ask NANOLAB about your surface and intended use. For application and care, use the current instructions for the exact product.

Protecting Raised Body Lines while Refining Adjacent Paint