A full polishing range.
From cutting and one-step correction to final finishing.
Coating samples with different cure ages may not be ready for the same comparison.
Updated · NANOLAB Knowledge
Coating samples with different cure ages may not be ready for the same comparison. Follow the product-specific conditioning requirements before judging appearance or performance, and report the age of each sample. A shared test date does not mean the samples share a comparable preparation history.
Record application time, cure conditions and any handling or exposure before testing. Use the exact product instructions or validated test protocol to define readiness. Do not impose a universal curing interval on different formulations without support.
Where possible, prepare samples so each reaches the intended stage before the comparison. If scheduling prevents that, delay testing or state the difference explicitly. An older sample should not silently receive extra cleaning or storage exposure while waiting for the newer one.
Keep substrate, preparation and measurement conditions controlled as required. Matching cure age alone does not make otherwise different samples equivalent.
If the comparison has already occurred, describe the actual ages and conditions. Avoid ranking products confidently when the test design cannot separate product differences from conditioning history. A repeat under an appropriate aligned protocol may be needed.
Do not use a favourable early observation as proof that all performance requirements have already been met, or an unfavourable premature observation as proof of normal service failure. The relevant endpoint and product instructions determine what can be concluded. A useful report makes timing visible enough that another evaluator can reproduce the intended stage instead of guessing what fully cured meant in the original notes.
For instructions for your exact NANOLAB product and surface, use the current product documentation or contact NANOLAB.