A full polishing range.
From cutting and one-step correction to final finishing.
Inspect polished paint under more than one controlled light condition to distinguish a robust finish from one that looks acceptable only under a single lamp.
Updated · NANOLAB Knowledge

A finish that looks clean under one lamp may show haze or remaining marks under another. Differences in illumination can reveal different features, so acceptance should include the conditions relevant to delivery and use.
Use a controlled inspection light for targeted defects and a broader view for overall appearance. Where warm and cool light sources are used, keep their positions and viewing geometry documented. Colour temperature alone does not define a lamp’s full inspection performance.
Use the polishing system’s supported residue-removal procedure and inspect the surface in a consistent state. Do not compare one residue-covered area under warm light with a cleaned area under cool light.
| View | Question |
|---|---|
| Targeted reflection | Are fine marks or haze visible? |
| Broad illumination | Is the overall finish consistent? |
| Representative delivery view | Does the customer-facing result meet the agreement? |
If a feature appears in only one setup, reproduce that setup before deciding it is insignificant. Check whether the feature follows the surface or a reflection from the environment.
Use examples of acceptable and unacceptable finish where practical. Record which lighting conditions belong to the inspection method so another operator can repeat the judgement.
Multiple views should improve diagnosis, not create an endless search for any possible mark. The goal is the agreed finish under defined relevant conditions, with remaining limitations documented rather than hidden by selecting the most flattering lamp.
Ask NANOLAB about your surface and intended use. For application and care, use the current instructions for the exact product.

Compound Residue in Seams: Include Cleanup in the Process Comparison